#Casperjs benchmark testing install#

One of its advantage is to allowing to run tests on real browsers.

CasperJS (with PhantomJS or SlimerJS) for functional/UI tests.

PHPUnit or Atoum for unit tests (PHP applications).

CasperJs: the same, just a simple and powerfull tool.

WebDriver is still unavoidable unless you want smoke tests (PhantomJS-based runtimes forget the web is more than 1 engine).

Watai: writing integration tests is one thing, writing them in a reliable & maintainable way is another.

#Casperjs benchmark testing install#

Intern: Uses WebDriver, so works to test all browsers async support using promises, not callbacks and test interfaces interfaces for unit testing and integration/function or polling easy one-command install with npm built-in code coverage, built-in Grunt support, built-in SauceLabs support enforces test case modularity extensible reporteal testing well-maintained.Mechanize + RSpec: We used to use Selenium, but reliability sucked.CasperJS: fast execution of functional/integration tests on top of PhantomJS (Webkit) + now compatible with Gecko using SlimerJS.When doing automated testing for Web applications/Web sites, what do you use? (selenium, PhantomJS, etc?) and why? Talk about real testing experience in a business context.Think about testing in a multi-browser context with different capabilities.

This was started on J9:00 AM EST on Etherpad Keep adding stuff 1.5 Some anonymized comments from elsewhereĪutomated Testing for Web applications and Web sites.1 Automated Testing for Web applications and Web sites.